Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Dartmouth-vfd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Delete this. Aside from throwing gasoline on an already incendiary issue, it is wildly inaccurate: Non-notability is an already established fact? substub? Should be merged? Give me a break. There is no need for this. Kevyn 07:17, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

  • It's a joke that has not been used on any articles, Kevyn. There is a Templates for Deletion page, I think. If it's deleted in 5 days, that should be fine, since the Dartmouth Flood ought to be over by then anyway. Delete. (No, I had no hand in the template in any form. Don't do templates.) Geogre 12:58, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • Comment: It is was being used [1], which is why I didn't just ignore it. Kevyn 14:20, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Remove it from Dartmouth Ski Patrol ASAP, and Delete in VfD timeframe. Niteowlneils 14:48, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • It's still on Dartmouth Ski Patrol, where it is indeed wildly inaccurate, as that article is far from being a substub. This is what creating joke templates leads to: somebody else is going to think it's even funnier to actually use them. Delete. Bishonen 09:24, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
      • So at least two people point out that it is being used on an article but neither removes it? WTF? anthony (see warning) 14:52, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • unnecessary, all Dartmouth College articles now sorted out. Shouldn't templates go on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion? Dunc_Harris| 18:45, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. RickK 19:31, Aug 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete -- Jmabel 22:26, Aug 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete when no longer being used on any articles. Angela. 00:49, Aug 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Replace with regular VfD template wherever used, then delete. Not likely to be useful in the immediate future, as the assignment is over. Do not move to BJAODN, as it isn't funny. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:22, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. No need to promote more bad feelings. Should really have been listed on TfD though. Gwalla | Talk 02:01, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • Comment. Yup. Should have been listed there. My bad. Kevyn 06:45, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Yes, it should have been listed on TfD. But I'm not wanting to quibble. We've wasted enough time on this. Andrewa 14:15, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

keepVagrant 21:00, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)